A. Error of facts and misapprehension of legal principles (1) Defendant’s act and victim D’s death do not have a causal relationship.

(2) There is no injury to the victim J.

B. Legal principles are self-defense to inflict an injury on a victim in the course of defending the victim'sO's assault.

C. The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) In light of the fact-finding of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victim D was abused by the defendant and complaining of the difficulty in urology from this framework, and the victim showed symptoms such as urology around July 3, 2012. On the 9th day of the same month, it was sent to G hospital with acute crymosis in an emergency and urculatory crymosis, etc., which had been conducted by the first day of the same month, but died of the heart due to heart crymosis, which had been conducted by the court below, and due to the fact-finding by the medical specialist in G hospital. According to the fact-finding statement prepared by the medical specialist in G hospital B, the victim D cannot be viewed as a psychological chromatice, and the victim's physical urcology had a severe stress in the process of the crime of this case, which could cause the victim's urcology, and it could have a direct urculological disorder in the process of this case.

Korea.