beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.16 2014나8923

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 23, 2012, around 03:20 on September 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) boarded the Plaintiff’s taxi; (b) and (c) brought a dispute between the Plaintiff and the taxi moving route and the taxi cab on the shore in the Sacheon-si-si.

(hereinafter “instant case”). (b)

At the time of the instant case, the Plaintiff reported to 112 and 119 by stating that “In the course of the said dispute, vinyl bars, in which the Defendant had been suffering from an illness, are classified into the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s title.” After the instant case, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by Samcheon Pacheon Hospital as “Sacheon Pacheon Hospital’s salt and tension,” and “Sacheon Pacheon Hospital,” and received medical treatment at Dental clinic.

C. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 from the Changwon District Court Jinju Branch on August 2, 2013, as the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 201,50,000 from the Changwon District Court Jinju Branch on August 2, 2013, and the said summary order became final and conclusive on the 21st of the same month.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 4-1, 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Assertion and determination

A. 1) At the time of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff by strokeing the Plaintiff’s timber and tension that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment; (b) on purpose or by negligence, with the Plaintiff’s face attached to the vinyl paper, which caused a stroke, and caused an injury to the Plaintiff due to the strokeing of the stroke and stroke, which requires medical treatment for about four weeks; and (c) the Defendant is responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the said tort; (d) the Defendant divided the Plaintiff’s timber on the instant day, and caused the injury to the Plaintiff, but there was no fact that there was no injury by taking the Plaintiff’s face with the stroke of the plastic paper containing the stroke in which the stroke, which caused the Plaintiff’s disease within the taxi).