The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the public performance in the crime of insult, acts not contrary to social rules, and the causal relation with

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.