행정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) The plaintiff argues that the disposition of business suspension may be taken against a licensed real estate agent only when a licensed real estate agent does not sign and seal both a confirmation description of the object of brokerage and a contract document. However, as the court of first instance properly states, considering the legal text and amendment process up to the current Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, legislative purport, etc., even if a licensed real estate agent does not sign and seal any one of the confirmation description of the object of brokerage and contract document, it is reasonable to deem that the business suspension is a reason for Article 39 (1) 7 and 9 of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, even if the licensed real estate agent does not sign and seal any one of the confirmation description of the object of brokerage and contract document. The plaintiff's argument is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.