If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

around 12:15 on January 14, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around the D’s restaurant operated by the Victim C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (b) around 19 minutes, the Victim E was the friendship of the victim; and (c) despite the fact that the victim’s spouse did not have stolen another person’s money, the victim’s spouse damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts. (d) the Defendant is the wife of the Republic of Korea while the customer and the underground singing service provider, etc. hears the victim; and (e) the Victim E was the wife of the Republic of Korea; and (e) the Defendant was the wife of the Republic of Korea.

(A) Although the Defendant denies the facts charged, the Defendant directly reported that the victim made the above defamation remarks and recognized the facts charged against the Defendant in light of the witness. The gist of the evidence is as follows.

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Written confirmations of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (inspection and reproduction of H CCTV images), investigation reports (investigation of reference witnesses), investigation reports (whether false information on suspect's remarks is false or not);

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;