Of the facts charged in the instant case, the indictment against insult is dismissed.

On September 1, 2014, from around 19:30 to 20:15 on the same day, the Defendant did not pay the taxi expenses to the taxi and did not leave the taxi, and the Defendant did not pay the taxi expenses to the above B and the taxi. Accordingly, in order to report the Defendant, the Defendant was driving the taxi to the front of the D zone located in the si in the si in the si.

The Defendant continued to resist the disturbance in front of the said D District, stating that “I am accurately to the taxi engineer, pay a taxi fee, and return home at the time I am home.” The Defendant said that I am to E at the seat of the D District Police Station D District of the Yeongdong Police Station, the foregoing taxi engineer B and the neighboring commercial merchants are able to observe.”

At the same time, at the same place, the Defendant assaulted the above E’s chest who arrested the Defendant in the act of insult with 2 to 3 times, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and B;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,500,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (the period by which the amount of KRW 100,000 is converted into one day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence: (a) of the Criminal Act: (b) the Defendant has divided the Defendant’s mistake in depth; (c) the degree of assault that the police officer exercised against the police officer is minor; (d) the police officer found the police officer; (e) the police officer submitted a written application seeking the Defendant’s wife; and (e) the police officer attempted to arrest the Defendant in the act of insult the police officer, etc. while intending to boom the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s resistance to this, the police officer was deemed to have exercised the force of force to force the police officer’s body during the process of protesting against the police officer; and (e) the requirements for arrest of the offender