교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:45, driven a BA-pubed vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content 0.090% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol level 0.090%, from the front line of “B-pubing restaurant” located in the interesting jun-si in the original city to the private village of the original city.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle of lurged B.
On October 20, 2015, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle while under the influence of 0.090% alcohol during blood, and continued to drive the vehicle along four lanes in front of the intersection of the ethic village of the ethic village of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City of the ethic City along the intersection of the ethic village of the ethic village of the ethic City of the Republic of Korea.
At night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the traffic situation on the front side more well and to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and took part of the back part of the victim C(49) rocketing taxi driving in the direction of the Defendant, which was stopped by the Defendant, as part of the back part of the victim C(49) driving, which was driven by the Defendant’s driver, and due to the shock, the said taxi was pushed down in the front part of the victim E(36 years old) driving, which led to the shock of the front part of the said taxi, the lower part of the victim G(31 years old) driving in the front part of the said taxi, which led to the shocking part of the back part of the victim G(3 years old) driving in the front part of the said taxi.
Defendant 1 caused injury to the said victim C, such as “brain sugar,” which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence, and injury to the victim I (the 19 years of age), who is the dong of the said taxi, requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim I (the 19 years of age), and the victim J (the 10 years of age) who is the said victim E and her son.