The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law of violation of logical and empirical rules and violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just for the court below to reject the defendant's assertion on mental and physical disability, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles on mental and physical disability, as alleged in the grounds

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.