[Criminal Power] On July 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on January 18, 2017.

[2018 Highest 3031] Around March 5, 2018, the Defendant 22:00 used the Defendant’s work and her first responded to a police officer in the course of taking emergency measures by having the police officer and first responded to the police officer, and the victim D(44 years of age) said that the Defendant her speech the Defendant, and the victim her head met several times on the wall of the victim, and assaulted the victim.

[2018 Highest 8145] The defendant is the actual representative of F (Representative G) corporation, the executive company located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E.

In fact, the Defendant only prepared an understanding angle between K and the representative of the J-based limited liability company, which is the executing company, in relation to the business of rebuilding the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu Ha building, and did not have been authorized to execute the construction by concluding a fixed contract, and was planning to receive and deliver only a part of the agreed amount to be paid to the above J without authority because there was no specific asset, which was agreed to be paid to the said J. The Defendant was planning to receive and deliver the advance subscription payment without authority. The Defendant did not have the right of normal execution of the H lending reconstruction due to the lack of the right to obtain a proper consent from the props for reconstruction, such as the name of advance subscription, the performance guarantee for the removal work, the performance guarantee, the sale advertising agency, etc., and there was no intention or ability

1. On August 31, 2017, the Defendant acquired money in advance under the name of a prior subscription, notwithstanding the fact that the said F office does not have a normal right to execute re-building, and even if the money and valuables were received from the victims as the advance subscription money, the Defendant did not have an intention or ability to sell the money and valuables properly.