beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.25 2015구단32036

국가유공자요건비해당결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Navy on March 17, 2014, but was discharged from military service on September 30, 2014.

B. On May 22, 2014, after completion of basic education and training for seven weeks, the Plaintiff moved into the permanent residence of the 22nd century, and the transfer took place on May 22, 2014, which was later, but was not treated differently, but on June 2014, the Plaintiff was shotd with a serious pain different from that of the relocation of Hudri, and was determined only by the Jind’s control, while visiting the stage, and on July 8, 2014, the Plaintiff was sick back again during the movement of the Mad Sea Water Sheet in the field of the visit to the Madern on July 10, 2014.

7. 21. As a result of the inspection conducted by the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital, the said hospital was diagnosed as “cirical and other conical obstacles accompanied by the nephical ppuri disease certificate.”

C. On April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the Defendant on the basis of filing an application for registration, and the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that: (a) on the ground that there is no special credit to recognize that the difference in the instant case occurred due to urgency, it cannot be deemed that the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the national defense, security, or the protection of the lives and property of the people was directly caused; and (b) it does not constitute the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”), but, on the ground that it does not constitute the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on the Support for Persons of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff received the basic education and training for 7 weeks after entering the Plaintiff, while the education and training for soldiers took physical force due to the relation closely performed in a short period, and in particular, the shooting training was a heavy burden.