특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that, in light of the various circumstances of this case, the Defendant asserts that the lower court’s imprisonment (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The circumstances favorable may be considered, such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant has mistakenly recognized the mistake, the fact that the victims whose identity has been verified agree with the victims, or that considerable amount of damage has been deposited, etc.
However, the defendant committed the crime of this case at multiple times even though he was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for the same criminal records, and the defendant did not complete the execution of the sentence on December 29, 2009, even though he was sentenced to imprisonment for the same criminal records, and even though he did not complete the execution of the sentence on December 29, 2009. The crime of this case committed the theft of money and valuables by means of removing the toilet window, etc. or impairing on the shoulder and shoulder, and it was not good that the crime of this case was committed, and other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the age-oriented environment of the defendant, are considered to be unfair. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. According to the conclusion, the appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.