The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

The Defendants are executive officers of the 2015 High-Family 13, and 2015 High-Family 128, military E-House sales promotion committee.

On May 20, 2014, the Defendants removed the above large-scale newsletter and conspired to recover the leaflets in the mail, on the grounds that the victim F included the leaflet distributed to each household mail from 201 to 207 of the above apartment units and the writing written in the large-scale bulletin attached to the elevator entrance of each of the above apartment units stated the issues about the business promoted by the above apartment units promotion committee.

On May 21, 2014, around 01:35, the Defendants collected 670 copies of the front section, which was distributed to each household mail, from 201 to 207 of the above apartment units, and concealed in the Defendant A’s house the sum of the front section attached to the elevator entrance of each of the above apartment units.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to conceal the documents of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2015, 13" and "2015, 128"

1. Each defendant's partial statement in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs and copies of leaflets;

1. Relevant Articles 366 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel posted and distributed the printed matters, etc. whose contents of defamation are obtained without the official seal of the Director of the Management Office. Moreover, Defendant A did not agree to posting and distributing F’s printed matters in currency with the Director of the Management Office, etc., and collected printed matters, etc. on the ground that Defendant A did not agree to do so. At the time of the instant case, as from May 23, 2014, the sales contract was scheduled between H Construction and the apartment resident, it was urgent before it.