1. On August 12, 2010, the Defendant made a false entry in the authentic copy of a notarial deed as if he/she had the authority to make a document by delegation of the said person on behalf of the said person on behalf of the said person on behalf of the said person, within the Seo-gu Daejeon District Office, Daejeon District Court Decision 200,000 won, recognizing that the obligation owed to the creditor as of August 12, 2010 to the creditor as of August 12, 2010 is KRW 450,000,000, and that the creditor filed an application with the said person to repay it in accordance with each of the following provisions, and that the creditor accepted and accepted it on August 19, 2010, KRW 50,000,000 in the amount and method due.

2.No 50,000,000 won on August 23, 2010;

3. 30,000,000 Won on August 30, 2010;

4.No 10,000,000 Won on September 10, 2010;

5.No 300,000,000 won on September 11, 2010;

6. The interest rate of KRW 10,000,000 per annum on October 10, 2010 shall be set at 30% per annum, and shall be paid on the tenth day of each month;

“Along with the fact that D borrowed money was not borrowed KRW 450,00,00 from G to the original copy of the notarial deed. However, even though the Defendant did not have any delegation from D with respect to the preparation of the notarial deed, the Defendant demanded G to provide collateral from G, thereby making the Defendant enter the fact of the notarial deed as above without D’s consent. As above, the Defendant had the Defendant enter the fact of the notarial deed (No. 8155 of the notarial deed No. 2010), which is the original copy of the notarial deed, into the notarial deed (No. 8155 of the notarial deed). Around that time, the Defendant had the Defendant keep the notarial deed of debt repayment (a quasi-loan for consumption) agreement wherein the notarial deed states the fact of the notarial deed as above, and exercised the notarial deed on January 3, 2011.