However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 1, 2017, the Defendant 02:30 around 02:0, on the front of the “D” road located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, with no reason, E (19 years of age) for a victim E (19 years of age) where he/she had used the road, and “I do not have a wrapping.”

Ep. Domestic affairs cannot be well known of the difficulties such as n.e.

“I ambling the Si expenses,” and the victim “I ambling the police.”

In the phrase “A”, the victim was assaulted of the victim by leading the victim to the “G” convenience store F in Daejeon-gu, leading the victim to the convenience store, leading the victim to the victim’s face number due to drinking and launching.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts, investigation reports (verification of Assault images);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime committed under the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records.

3. Unfavorable circumstances: The part dismissing the prosecution that the charge of this case does not be less light in light of the circumstances, contents, etc. of the crime of this case, and the favorable circumstances that are favorable to the victim: the confession of the crime of this case; the confession of the crime of this case; there is no record of criminal punishment more than the suspension of execution; and the fact that it seems that the crime of this case was

1. On August 23, 2017, at around 01:40 on August 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around the I convenience store located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu, Daejeon; (b) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant was able to ask the Defendant at his domicile in order to assist the Defendant, when the Victim B (20) was under the influence of alcohol; (c) placed the Victim’s view on one occasion by hand; and (d) then, the Defendant was able to see the Victim’s face one time by the Defendant’s hand before the K pharmacy located in the Daejeon Pungdong-gu, Daejeon Pungdong-gu.