However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 15, 2015, the Defendant was charged with non-detained on charges of violating the Music Industry Promotion Act (Act No. 13702) at the Seoul Eastern District Court (Seoul Eastern District Court) and applied for formal trial upon receiving a summary order of KRW 1 million on January 15, 2016. The summary of the facts charged was that “The Defendant was a person who operates a “D” singing practice in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and that “E, F, and G, who are juveniles, entered a singing practice book at a time other than the hours for which they are allowed to enter, sell alcoholic beverages to the said juveniles, and arrange for a entertainment loan” around September 13, 2015.

The defendant, who is the case of the above formal trial, had the mind to ask E and G to testify as a witness in the case of violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act No. 2016, 307, which is the Seoul Eastern District Court, which is the case of the above formal trial.

Therefore, on August 23, 2016, Seoul Eastern District Court No. 4 (Seoul Eastern District Court) located in 404, Asansan-ro, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on August 23, 2016.

G refers to “A request for testimony to see that “the memory to frighten frighten is frighten”, thereby having G make a false testimony, and, in the meantime, to E arriving in the Roman court, the “day is more complicated, and the width is good.”

The testimony was changed to mean that “I do not know any helper in singing, and do not breath it.” The talking to give an excessive testimony to other witnesses was completed,” which led E to the mind that I would give a false testimony.

E, on the same day, was present as a witness of the above case and taken an oath, and the facts were ordered at the Defendant’s singing room and attempted to do so, but the attorney’s “I knew that I had the text.”

“I have become aware of the order” in the question “I have become aware of.”

The testimony was made, and the lawyer testified as “for example,” on the physical record of “Abrupty of having become aware of”.

And G.