A Imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won.

Defendant

A is sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime on August 9, 2010 by the Seoul Eastern District Court on two occasions, including a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.). On December 11, 2006, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of a fine of two million won on three occasions for the same crime; and on September 16, 2010, the defendant C was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of five million won for the same crime.

1. Defendant A

A. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) committed an act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. for business from May 22, 2014 to May 27, 2014, by receiving KRW 90,000 from customers F from customers, and allowing employees B to perform similarity.

(b) No person who violates the School Health Act shall conduct business to provide services which are likely to engage in physical contacts between unspecified persons, sexual conduct, such as exposure to smuggling parts, or conduct any similar conduct, in school environmental sanitation and cleanup zones;

Nevertheless, from May 22, 2014 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic of “E” on the first floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu D underground which was approximately 159 meters away from the National University, a School Sanitation Cleanup Zone.

2. Defendant B, from May 22, 2014 to May 27, 2014, the Defendant engaged in sexual traffic by engaging in the act of similaritying under the condition that he/she receives 20 million won for 30,000 won, and 50,000 won for 30 minutes from the above “E” against the non-registered customers.

3. Defendant C, on May 27, 2014, did not qualify as a massage club on the condition that the Defendant would receive KRW 30,000, and KRW 50,000 for 30,00 from customers with no personal identity under the above “E”.