Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

1. Defendant A operated Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) in Busan Seo-gu and engaged in meat packaging business.

From January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017, the Defendant sold the total amount of KRW 51,220,207,207, indicating the phrase “HALAMB” and the height of the animal pattern as if the Defendant had not been certified of grow.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false marking on the livestock products.

2. Defendant B’s representative director who is Defendant B’s Defendant Company, made a false marking on livestock products as described in paragraph (1) with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's legal statement corresponding thereto;

1. The facts charged in this case are that the defendants and the defense counsel's assertion as to the confirmation of the weather regulations in Islamic marks (Korean Islamic marks, (states) indication, the sales site verification), the appearance "(HALAL)," the indication of the internal investigation report (states), and the verification of the field of mass packaging processing) were sold with false indication as if the defendants were certified with the appearance certification although they were not certified.

On the other hand, the Defendants and the defense counsel asserted that the products sold by the Defendants (hereinafter “products of this case”) were cut and re-packageded in line with the purpose of the imported livestock products which were certified as being raised in Australia only, and that the processed livestock products are not required only in the course of the slaughter, but only in the case of cutting and repackaging the meat meat slaughtered in accordance with the growth awareness, the separate consciousness of raising is not required, and thus, it is not a false marking.

(1) In the manufacturing method of livestock products, no one shall indicate [Article 32 (1) 2 and 32 of the Sanitary Control of Livestock Products (hereinafter referred to as the "Act¡±) that is different from the facts, or exaggerated labelling, or misleading or misleading consumers. The method of manufacturing livestock products shall be indicated differently from the facts.