Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated from the accused.

From the end of June 2015 to October 23, 2015, the Defendant installed a game room in the “CPC room” located in Sungnam-si A, and operated the game room in the six computers, and charged customers with a cash of 10,000 won per 10,000 won game machine by intentionally losing the game machine and caused them to use the game machine, such as “ker”, “sat,” “sat,” “sat,” and “sat-to-sat,” and then exchanged the game score of KRW 10,000,000 among the games that have been acquired to customers whose games were finished, into cash.

Accordingly, the defendant exchanged the result obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry, and Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry [the scope of recommendations] [the grounds for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry [the scope of recommendations], the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the special sentencing person] of the two types (money exchange, money exchange brokerage, and re-purchase business] (the decision of sentence] of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry, since the defendant repeats the crime two times of punishment, it is inevitable to sentence the defendant as a sentence

However, in consideration of the favorable sentencing reasons, such as the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the size of the game site is not large, and that there is no calendar force in the sentence, etc., the sentence shall be determined like the order.