If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

[Criminal Power] On November 2, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s Branch Branch on July 13, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in a wooden prison on July 13, 201

【Criminal Facts】

1. A theft: (a) around 14:00 on June 27, 2012, the Defendant: (b) went back on an emergency vehicle, which carried out a physical exercise equivalent to KRW 150,000 in the market price owned by the victim E, which was located there, using the gap in the surrounding surveillance in the “D” operated by the victim B, who was in front of the above top point; and (c) was stolen by driving a 600ckiki in the market price of KRW 12,00,000 in the market price owned by the victim B, who was parked in front of the above top point.

2. Around 14:00 on June 27, 2012, the Defendant driven a 600cc business kikiki without a license plate without obtaining a small driver’s license from the front day of Gangwon-si to the front day of the Gowon-si Undong Undong Undong Undong Undong-si apartment at Gangwon-si, the Defendant driven a 600cc business kiki without a license plate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and E;

1. Seizure records and investigation reports (the addition of victims and damaged articles);

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (investigative Records No. 29-31, 53-57)

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for a crime, the choice of penalties, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. It is true that the reason for sentencing on Article 32(1)2 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation, etc. to dismiss an application for compensation order, inasmuch as the Defendant was punished as larceny, etc. and again committed larceny, etc. even during the period of repeated crime, it is necessary to strictly punish

On the other hand, however, there are all damaged goods by way of temporary return, etc.