특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is highly high in alcohol content of the defendant's blood alcohol content, in light of the traffic accident situation and the degree of shock of the vehicle, the defendant's negligence is heavy in light of the situation of the traffic accident and the degree of the shock of the vehicle, the other vehicles parked after the accident were parked and the defendant was sentenced to suspended sentence for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and the defendant committed the crime of this case before the lapse of one month from the date of the sentence without being aware of the suspended sentence for the crime of this case, but he was found to have committed the crime of this case before the day of the sentence. However, even though the defendant was sentenced to suspended sentence for the crime of this case, he did not have any history of criminal punishment for the crime of this case except for minor criminal records and the crime of injury before and after the sentence, the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the defendant agreed with the victim only once a week after the occurrence of the accident, and the agreement among the judgment of the court below is also paid to the defendant's age, character, character, family environment, and social relation, and circumstances after the crime of this case.
2. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.