1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant A’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged (excluding the portion of innocence) was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and exceeding the bounds of logical and empirical rules,

2. As to Defendant B’s appeal, the Defendant did not submit a legitimate appellate brief within the period prescribed by Article 379(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the petition of appeal does not contain any description of the grounds for objection.

3. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant F’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the instant facts charged (excluding the portion of innocence) was guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by violating logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on

4. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.