2. The judgment of the court below is that each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant is found in the residence of the victim who committed the crime of this case where the defendant, who committed the crime of this case with her husband, was found to have no record of criminal punishment before the crime of this case, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case with knee kel kel kel kel kel kel, and the victim was taken in a cell phone. The victim could have caused a considerable sense of shame due to each of the crimes of this case. The victim's dwelling at the time of each of the crimes of this case was committed not only the victim but also her husband, but also her family members including her husband. The defendant could have suffered a considerable mental shock, which is disadvantageous to the defendant. The defendant's crime of this case was committed in the process of taking into account the issue of the victim and her husband's in the process of threatening relationship with the defendant's husband, and the defendant's age, age, environment, family relation, motive and circumstances after the crime of this case are not justified.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.