When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 08:00 on April 22, 2017, the Defendant intended to use a toilet at “C cafeteria” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but “the use of another toilet during cleaning” obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 10 minutes, including, but not limited to, the victim’s face of the victim, who is an employee, expressed that the victim D’s horse would be bad for drinking, i.e., “g., during cleaning,” going beyond the string and opened the string, and the victim’s face to restrain it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order recognize and reflects the crime of this case, the defendant has no record of punishment except for the defendant who was sentenced once to a fine prior to the instant case, and the defendant has no record of punishment other than the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, prosecutor's life, etc. shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions for sentencing.