임대차보증금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. The portion of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is dismissed or added, is dismissed or added as follows: “The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., the Plaintiff’s son and the Defendant’s employee was employed as the employee of the Defendant.”
The third 11th part of the judgment of the court of first instance is that “G has not received the Defendant’s seal from the above contract as theG refused it.”
In the first instance judgment, the first instance court rendered a judgment against a company mobilization medicine on the ground that “On the other hand, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a lease agreement as stipulated in the first contract, and the third contract was entered into in accordance with the agreement, and the second contract was entered into differently from the actual agreement, and thus, the Defendant’s unpaid rent pursuant to the first and third contract was entirely extinguished if it deducted from the lease deposit,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is,” in the first and third contract, on September 19, 2017.
Part "A witness E and I's testimony" in the fourth 13th 13th s of the judgment of the first instance shall be "A witness E, a part of witness E, a witness G, and a witness of the first instance court".
The following shall be added to the nine 19th day of the first instance judgment:
On the other hand, the F appeared as a witness at the trial, and the F sought the plaintiff on November 24, 2015 after being delegated by the Defendant with the authority to conclude the lease contract. On the other hand, the F first judged the original copy of the second contract.
The plaintiff and the defendant.