Nos. 1 through 5 of seized evidence from Defendant B and No. 6 of this title.

1. Defendant B is an operator of “D Gameland” in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

A game products related business entity shall not allow others to gamble or perform other speculative acts, or leave them unattended so that they may do so by using the game products.

Nevertheless, from April 7, 2018 to April 8, 2018, the Defendant stated the game numbers and points remaining in the game machine in paper on the paper for customers who completed the game in the above game room, and neglected to recognize that customers exchange the points specified in the above paper A through A in cash.

As a result, the Defendant, as a game products related business entity, neglected to do gambling and other speculative acts using game products.

2. No person who defendant A shall exchange tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, the defendant completed the game at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, and then paid the result of the game in cash by calculating 10% per unit, excluding the exchange commission for 10% for the paper received by the customers as specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Two times each protocol of police interrogation of E and F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A H statement;

1. Game description, juvenile game providing business operator registration certificate, certificate of game classification, certificate of game product classification, field photograph, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 44(1)1 and Article 28 subparag. 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; the choice of imprisonment

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry (the defendants) is socially accepted, such as encouraging a speculative spirit and hindering the citizens' awareness of sound labor.