If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 26, 2017, at around 01:26, the Defendant: (a) received a notification from a slope E belonging to the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and received a 112 report and received a notification of interference with business, and (b) took a bath to the effect that “the Defendant received money” and “the Defendant received money”; (c) took a bath to the effect that the above E’s name tag was drinking; and (d) took one time for drinking; and (e) assaulted the said E’s e’s e’s e’s e’s e’s ethmp.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that punishment of fines shall be imposed by taking into account the following factors: (a) favorable to the reasons for sentencing (the recognition of a crime and the attitude of reflecting the depth thereof; (b) the person appears to have committed a contingent crime under drinking; and (c) there is no record of crime exceeding fines for the last twenty-five years (which has been twice force related to violence, but has been long). However, the amount of fines shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing revealed in the instant case, including the degree and form of force used by the police during the instant crime, the background and motive leading to the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.