특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is against the defendant, there is no record of punishment for the same crime, the victim of this case is minor, the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant in the original judgment.
However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant committed a traffic accident prior to an expressway without taking necessary measures despite causing the traffic accident, and the nature of the crime is not weak, and there are many victims of the injury due to the traffic accident of this case, and even though it does not result from the same crime, the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime, and the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime. Considering the various sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relation, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below (7 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.