beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.22 2014나48667

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and all the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1.The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the request for appraisal by the appraiser D by the court of first instance for appraiser D by the court of first instance:

Plaintiff

A1) On September 7, 2013, around 08:40 on September 7, 2013, the driver of the E-vehicle covered by the Defendant’s comprehensive automobile insurance driving the said vehicle in the items of the Gun bridge B in the direction of Sung-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, and is Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”). The vehicle is Plaintiff A.

2) The instant accident was caused by the shocking accident (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) After the instant accident, the Plaintiff Company A repaired the Plaintiff Company G, and the Defendant paid KRW 3,432,000 insurance money to the repair cost, etc.

3) The main repair content of Plaintiff A’s vehicle is the left-hand fence, the exchange of language panels, the exchange of members with both sides, etc., and the Plaintiff B’s comprehensive car insurance. (B) On September 8, 2013, the Plaintiff A’s driver, who was insured by the Defendant, was driving the said vehicle in the vicinity of the Gyeong-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, 717-7, around September 13, 2013, and caused an accident attributable to Plaintiff B’s I SM5 car (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”).

(2) After the accident of this case No. 2, the plaintiff B was repaired by the J industry company of the automobile repair business, and the defendant paid 3,965,600 won insurance money as repair expenses, etc.

C. Plaintiff C1) On July 26, 2013, Plaintiff C (hereinafter Plaintiff C) was driving the said vehicle on the front side of the Cheongdong-dong, Cheongdong-si, Cheongdong-si on July 16, 2013 by the Defendant’s vehicle comprehensive insurance, and Plaintiff C (hereinafter Plaintiff C).