beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.04.28 2015고정157

상해

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of the charge is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) and the husband’s family members, and (c) around September 3, 2015, the Defendant’s demand on September 3, 2015 to bring about the head of a Tong created and managed by the Defendant in the E-parking parking lot located in Jeju City around 18:30 on September 3, 2015, was newly issued by C; (b) the Defendant was able to obtain transaction details and the balance of the head of the Tong at one time at the time, and the Defendant suffered injury, such as the spathal of the infant requiring approximately two-day medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. C’s statement and diagnosis statement are admissible as evidence corresponding to the above facts charged that the Defendant inflicted a bodily injury on C, such as a baby of a baby who needs approximately two weeks of medical treatment, etc.

B. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances are revealed.

1) The diagnosis document of G dental clinic submitted by C is written as follows: “The left-hand fluoral department on the left-hand side of the injury,” and “Isia’s brue summary No. 27.” with respect to the part and degree of injury.

In that sense, according to the fact-finding response on G dental clinics, it is very low possibility that the healthy 27 sckes might be shakeed with the floor of the hand alone without the damage of the skin.

2) According to the above factual inquiry reply, at the time C applied on September 4, 2015, the existing chronic diversitis C, which was 27th of the 2015, had been recovered, and there was a sacity in the Pasi ppuri part, but there was a probability that A may sasibly sa.

3) According to the Defendant’s reply to factual inquiries about the Health Insurance Corporation, C received several dental treatments from March 201 to June 2015, 2015, under the name of C, such as “cement of cement questioning,” “non-dong-free intermediate farming,” “non-dong-free intermediate farming,” “non-cognity,” and “brupted fladying fladity of a water control source,” etc.

4) C shall be applied to the left side of the Defendant at the time in this Court.