beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.08.30 2013고단1359

공문서위조

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 2013, 2013, the Defendant was under influence of drinking alcohol and the same year.

2. When it is anticipated that a driver's license will be suspended from the middleman, the driver's license has been suspended on the Internet, and the driver's license was forged and used by requesting it to a false driver on his name.

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant forged C’s driver’s license by inserting the Defendant’s photograph and inserting it to the Defendant’s domicile on February 6, 2013, at the Defendant’s home located in Seongbuk-si, which was known through the Internet search. After requesting the forgery of the driver’s license, the Defendant e-mail stored the Defendant’s driver’s license and the Defendant’s photograph. On April 21, 2011, the Defendant, without authority, sent C(D) a first-class ordinary driver’s license on April 21, 201 without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to exercise on a non-commercial site, by inserting the Defendant’s photograph, and then sent C’s driver’s license to the Defendant’s domicile via Kimpo-po on February 6, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above-mentioned person, forged C's driver's license in the name of the commissioner of the Gyeongnam Police Agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The same sentence as the order shall be determined in consideration of the criminal records of the defendant, forged driver's license, seizure from the customs clearance stage, the defendant's mistake is against the defendant, family relationship, etc., with the reason for sentencing under Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.