A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

피고인들은 2014. 6. 1. 01:30경 서울 강남구 D 앞 노상에서 술에 취한 상태로 택시를 기다리던 중 피해자 E(28세)가 피고인 B을 쳐다보았다는 이유로 피해자에게 “뭘 야리냐, 씨발 새끼야”라고 욕설을 하고 피해자가 이에 대응하면서 서로 시비가 되었다.

Accordingly, the defendant A, who was unable to go back to the next after the victim et al., forced the victim to take a hald by the method of halding the victim's hald, and the defendant B dalddd the victim's hald by drinking.

When F, who is the one of the victims, was the defendants, the defendant B continued to reply to the victim's face, chest, and the part of the ship while "I am the father of our country, I am the prosecutor, I am I am I am I am I am I am."

Defendant A, who tried to escape from the nearby alley by the victim who sustained assault against the Defendants, had the victim escaped again, and the victim saw the victim's face, chest, ship, etc. to be drinking. Defendant B, who followed the victim's face to drinking, fry, etc., followed up the victim's face to the floor, followed up the victim's face and chest, followed up the victim's face, followed up to the victim's face and chest, followed up by the victim's face, followed up to the victim's face, followed up to the victim's face, followed up to the victim's face, followed up to the victim's face, followed by the victim's face, followed by the victim's victim's victim's face, and led the surrounding person to go up to the victim's face, Defendant B, who attempted to go up to the victim by the police officer." Rather, Defendant B, who attempted to leave the victim until the police officer arrives.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as the 10-day upper part of the right side in need of approximately 10 weeks of treatment, the upper part of the conical signboard escape floor in need of at least 8 weeks of treatment, the closed inside part of the 5-day treatment, the lower part of the inner wall, and the structural frame of the inner wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendants: