However, for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence against Defendant A.

1. Defendant A is not a person handling narcotics, etc.

At around 18:00 on October 3, 2016, the Defendant sold to E a 40,000 won-free fababa (hereinafter “Yabab”) in the form of a psychotropic drug, a psychotropic drug, a psychotropic drug, at 613 Offices of Kimpo-ro, Kimpo-ro (hereinafter “Maba”).

B. The defendant 1-A

At the same place as in the same time as in the paragraph, E, each camping day, with E, shall be raised up to the day of gambling, and thereafter, the postponement arising from the heating of the base, as soon as possible, shall be administered in such a manner as to inhale as soon as possible.

C. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 19:25, on the street in front of the Kimpo D Officetel, the Defendant: (b) had a view to receiving KRW 200,000 as a water fee; and (c) had a view to delivering it to “G” a person who is a buyer from the upper line “F.”

2. Defendant B is not a person handling narcotics. A.

At around 20:00 on September 16, 2016, the Defendant administered a medication in a way that she inhales as soon as possible any smoke that occurs due to the heating of Rabs. At around 20:0, the Defendant, together with H, E, I, I, I, and WJ, two women. One fact, three male including the suspect, must be raised on the day of the gambling. The Defendant administered the medication in a way that she inhales the smoke as soon as possible.

B. On September 24, 2016, at the same place as the preceding paragraph, around 06:00, the Defendant administered two females, together with H, E, one “I”, one “J”, and two “J” in the same manner, and three male persons, including the suspect, including the suspect, were administered.

C. On October 1, 2016, the Defendant around 20:00 and around 20:0

At the same place as the paragraph, H and E have been administered in the same manner as paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E and H:

1. The police statement of K;

1.As a result of each simplified reagents, each country and its water-related narcotics appraisal report, drilling report (malking appraisal report), investigation report (the market price of narcotics-related substances should be reported);