2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On July 12, 2015, the Plaintiffs concluded a sales contract with the Defendant stating that “The Plaintiff shall sell at KRW 134, 52, and 186, a sum of KRW 186,000,000,000,000,000,000 to the Plaintiffs. However, the Defendant shall pay the down payment of KRW 100,000 to the Plaintiffs up to July 14, 2015, and the remainder of KRW 500,00,000 to the “where there is no error in the lawsuit,” and that the Defendant shall compensate for the double amount of the down payment at the time of the breach

B. On July 13, 2015, the Defendant paid the Plaintiffs a down payment of KRW 100 million and KRW 50 million on the 14th day of the same month, and on the 15th day of the same month, the Defendant brought 57 Dus and 61 Dus and 4 Dus and 61 Dus and 14 determined as a voice as a result of the inspection of Bracul.

C. The Defendant, from July 20, 2015 to July 24, 2015, issued to the Plaintiffs KRW 250 million in succession, and paid KRW 400 million out of the agreed purchase price.

On July 28, 2015, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant drafted a small shipment certificate (Evidence A 3) stating that “The Plaintiff shall confirm the fact that the Plaintiff has taken over a large amount of 57 U.S. 57, U.S. 4, and a total of 61 U.S., and the Defendant shall take over the total of 32 U.S. 32, U.S. 20, U.S. 20, middle size cancer, and hydrogen each by August 5, 2015.”

E. However, when the plaintiffs refused to take out 68 copies of the lawsuit stated on the above shipping certificate on the ground that the remaining purchase and sale amount to KRW 200 million was unpaid, the defendant, on August 28, 2015, stated that the defendant, at his discretion, arbitrarily, the total of 29 copies of the lawsuit and 35 copies of the lawsuit total of 32 copies, 16 copies of the lawsuit, and 20 copies of the invoice total of 32 copies of the lawsuit, 16 copies of the lawsuit, and 68 copies of the invoice total of 32 copies of the lawsuit, 16 copies of the lawsuit, and 20 copies of the invoice, was stolen. However, after the examination in the formal trial, the defendant brought

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, 44, and Eul's 1-1, 2, 2.