A. The Defendant is the commencement of new apartment construction works in Busan Metropolitan City C and D 73 households on the ground.

During the new construction process of apartment buildings, F participated in the construction by requesting the appraisal of land and entering into a contract for the termination work with a certain authority delegated by the defendant company.

B. Upon F’s request, on April 4, 2012, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 20 million to the account in the name of G and KRW 10 million to the account in the name of H, respectively. On March 28, 2013, the Plaintiff wired KRW 40 million to the account in the name of I.

C. On March 27, 2013, the Plaintiff and F drafted a sales contract with the seller’s “Defendant and F,” “Plaintiff,” “Plaintiff,” “62,400,000 won” (hereinafter referred to as the instant sales contract) with respect to E apartment Nos. 101, 903 (hereinafter referred to as “instant apartment”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, witness F, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff loaned money to the Plaintiff as the actual representative of the Plaintiff Company was insufficient for the E-Newly constructed construction capital, and the Plaintiff lent money to the account under the name of G on April 4, 2012, and transferred KRW 10 million to the account under the name of H. After which F recommended sale, the Plaintiff converted the sales contract for the instant apartment on March 27, 2013 into the part of the sales price, and completed the payment of the sales price by remitting KRW 40 million to the account under the name of F. However, the Defendant did not transfer the ownership of the instant apartment. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s sales contract is invalid as it was written by the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have the authority to prepare the sales contract in the instant case.

B. First of all, whether the instant sales contract (A No. 1) was forged or not.