The above golf practice site was located in a number of accidents where those who supplement the plaintiff's wing wing operations in the front of the wing wing wing operations. As to this point, the above golf practice site notified the first user of the above accidents, and notified the first user of the above accidents, requiring attention in the process of supplementing the wing light, and at the same time, notified the first floor, the second floor, the entrance and the second floor, and each wing wing with a notice as above. At the same time, the defendant was also aware of this fact. At that time, there was a practice by those other than the defendant, and thus, the defendant was also under duty of care to safely practice by examining whether there was a person who supplement the wing wing from the subsequent wing practice in the wing practice.

However, the Defendant neglected this and did not look at the surrounding area, and she sawd the victim’s right part of the victim E (the 42 years old), who sawd from the 36th Twit, the lower part of the Defendant’s right side of the victim E (the 42 years old), with the lower part of the Raber GH, suffered approximately 2 weeks of the right part of the right part in need of treatment.

2. Determination

A. In a golf campaign that generally requires high level of intensive power to keep snow from the hole through a spare wing from a manufacturer’s shop to a white-wing shop’s cut-out operation, there is a duty of care to wing with a person’s own, etc. by examining whether there is a person subsequent to the provisions within the golf practice ground, which should be emphasized only on golf, from the outside of the provisions within the golf practice ground to the point of view.

shall be deemed to be.