However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the former relationship with the victim B (n, 54 years of age) while teaching with the victim B.

At around 20:30 on May 28, 2019, the Defendant voluntarily brought the beer in the cooling house, on the ground that the victim “I want not to drink,” and brought about the beer in the cooling house, and the victim “I am frien,” “I am frien, I am frien, I am frien, and I am frien, I am frien, I am frien, and I am well see, “I amfrien, I am frien, I am frien, I am well, I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment [the determination of a type of punishment] interference with the affairs [the category 1] interference with the affairs (the special sentencing person]: Where the degree of power and deceptive scheme or the degree of interference with the affairs is minor, the commissioner of the punishment (including the recommended area and the scope of the recommended punishment] special mitigation area, imprisonment with prison labor for one month to eight months;

3. Determination of sentence: Four months of imprisonment and one year of suspended sentence;