2. The Defendant’s confession of the instant crime is favorable to the Defendant.

However, there is no circumstance to see that the defendant has four times of the same kind, that there was an agreement with the victim or that the victim acquired money, and that the court below has already determined the punishment by fully considering the above circumstances, and that there was no change of circumstances that could vary between the court below and the punishment at the time of the trial, and that there was no other change of circumstances that are conditions for sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is deemed appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.