When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 30, 2018, at around 08:05, the Defendant: (a) stolen the goods of the Defendant’s wife before the date, and applied the agreed money to the said convenience store owner; (b) drunkly, the Defendant used the drinking drinking water factoring that the victim demanded to change; (c) obstructed the Defendant’s business operation by force between approximately 10 minutes, such as cutting the victim’s cell phone to the convenience store display stand; and (d) assaulting the victim’s convenience store by taking such a cell phone, taking the victim’s cell phone, taking the victim’s cell phone, cutting the victim’s cell phone to the convenience store; and (e) taking the victim’s cell phone, taking the victim’s cell phone, she interfered with the victim’s business operation by force over the part of approximately 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;