However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 03:10 on March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 301, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the Defendant’s de facto marriage spouse at the Defendant’s residence, and (c) obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of reported cases and prevention of crimes, by assaulting F at one time, such as assaulting F’s face, “Chewing, dead, and dead,” and assaulting F’s face at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. It shall be decided as ordered for the reason that the suspended execution is not less than Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is repented in depth, five times of a fine and the fact that there is no previous conviction);