beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.28 2015가단43010

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 284,165,335 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 14, 2012 to November 28, 2017; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On July 13, 2012, the Plaintiff, along with wife B, 15:10 on July 13, 2012, was able to walk up a way to stop down in front of Incheon Seo-gu, Incheon and was able to draw up his/her lectures.

She, however, at the same time, the car between the plaintiff and the plaintiff's husband (hereinafter referred to as "vehicle") was carried, and the plaintiff was found to have been seated in order to find out whether the plaintiff was demoted.

However, the above Maritime Vehicle did not discover it and shocked the plaintiff's left side to the front part, and the plaintiff moved a water meter to the front part of the Maritime Vehicle's Bows and fell into the floor.

【Personal Accident” (hereinafter “instant accident”) the Plaintiff was hospitalized and provided medical treatment by suffering from injury, such as satise, satise-under, satise-under, and satise-flaver dule-in satise-under, the left-hand satis.

x) The defendant is the insurer of the sea-going vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, and Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The instant accident, based on the liability, was caused by the negligence of the driver of a sea-going vehicle who violated the duty of the Jeonju, and thus, the Defendant, the insurer, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages arising from the said

C. Restrictions on liability, however, on the road where the instant accident occurred, even though there is no central line, the asphalt length of the vehicle is in the width that enables the operation of the vehicle, and the delivery is not installed separately, so see the following and see NAV interview. The Plaintiff appears to have predicted that the vehicle was in progress at the front and rear side.

In addition, even though the plaintiff had already been employed by the engine of the sea-going vehicle, it was possible to take measures to avoid collision, such as fasting to the edge of the road, but rather, he was sitting and stopped on the middle of the road, and as such, it is difficult for the plaintiff to find the plaintiff.