대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The judgment below
The summary of the evidence is "2017 order 804" in the first place.
The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (amounting to KRW 20 million, confiscation) is too unreasonable, but in full view of the various circumstances, which are the conditions for the sentencing specified in this case, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument is without merit.
Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the evidence of the judgment below "2017 order 804" in the first sentence of "2017 order order 1679" in the summary of the evidence of the judgment below is "2017 order order 1679", and "the defendant A's legal statement" in the second sentence is "each of the defendants' respective legal statements", and it is evident that the attached list 1 of the crime list attached to the judgment of the court below is an omission of part of the attached list 1 of the crime list attached to this judgment, and thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on