전자금융거래법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (amounting to five million won) is too excessive and unfair (the grounds for appeal submitted by the Defendant to December 1, 2016) was stated as the grounds for appeal, but the reasons for appeal, which was later filed on January 4, 2017, stated only unfair grounds for appeal, and the reasons for appeal submitted on January 4, 2017, were stated as the grounds for appeal, and the reasons for appeal as to mistake of facts at the first trial date of the first trial of the first trial of the first trial of the first trial of the first instance of the first instance of the first instance.
On the other hand, the instant crime was committed by providing account numbers, physical cards, etc. that can be used for other crimes, including phishing crimes, and in light of the social malicious records, etc., the degree of illegality is grave; the Defendant agreed to receive the price; the quality of the crime was bad; and the damage was incurred due to the use of the access media supplied by the Defendant for the crime, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendant.
In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's improper argument in sentencing is rejected.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.