A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the first floor underground of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Building E (hereinafter “instant building”) and is the representative of the first floor underground of the instant building, and the Defendants are part of the sectional owners of the first floor food store of the instant building (hereinafter “instant store”).

B. Since the sectional owners of the store of this case did not form a business district after the purchase of the store of this case, the F Promotion Committee was organized mainly by the Defendants, and Defendant D was responsible for the initial chairperson, and Defendant B was responsible for the three primary chairpersons.

C. On April 8, 2010, the Defendants prepared a letter of commitment stating that “the Defendants jointly and severally liable for civil and criminal expenses, etc. to solve the problem of a sectional owner and the remaining lessee.” On August 23, 2010, the Defendants recognized that they made unconstitutional efforts to negotiate with non-exclusive owners and lessees to promote a lump-sum lease, and paid KRW 90,00,000 for the purpose of successful reward, compensation, etc., and that the Plaintiff shall bear the criminal agreement amount anticipated to occur after the rent, attorney appointment cost, and penalty, etc. regardless of the above amount.” On November 11, 2010, the Defendants prepared a letter of commitment stating that “the MOU contract concluded with the lessee during the process of promoting the lump-sum lease of the instant case was unconstitutionally endeavored by the Plaintiff to enter into the agreement with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on August 19, 201, which did not agree with the Plaintiff’s 20-day lessee and the Plaintiff’s 10-day rental agreement.”