beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.10.30 2014노947

전자금융거래법위반

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant committed the crime of this case at another time despite the fact that the defendant had the record of suspending indictment for the same kind of crime, and the act of transferring the means of access, such as this case, harms the trust and stability of financial transaction, and further, the head of the Tong and the cke card transferred by the defendant need to be used as a tool of a serious crime, such as singing, singing, etc., and should be punished strictly; however, it appears that the defendant is recognized and against the crime of this case; there is no economic situation as a basic living beneficiary; it is difficult for the defendant to be economically; the defendant suffers from depression; the defendant suffers from depression; and the defendant's identity is not good health; in light of all the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the prosecutor's assertion as above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.