beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.01.14 2019가단246138

공사대금

Text

Of the lawsuit in this case, the lawsuit against the defendant C and the defendant B apartment house reconstruction and improvement project association are pending.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff runs the design and construction business of preventive facilities, etc., Defendant B apartment reconstruction and rearrangement project association (hereinafter “Defendant B apartment reconstruction and rearrangement project association”) is an association that has conducted the housing reconstruction business of Daejeon apartment house B (hereinafter “instant business”), and Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company that has contracted design services from D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

B. In the process of implementing the instant project, the Defendant Cooperative entered into a design service contract with the Defendant Company at the time of signing a contract with the Defendant Company, setting the duration from August 2015 to August 2015 to August 5, 2015 to August 532, 200,000, and the duration from August 2015, 2015 to August 1, 2015.

(c)

On September 2015, the Plaintiff prepared a contract for construction work with the Defendant Company as follows, and the client of the contract is the Defendant Company and the beneficiary.

On September 11, 2015, the Defendant Company remitted to the Plaintiff the down payment of KRW 41,800,000 (including value added tax) as stipulated in the instant construction contract (hereinafter “the instant construction contract”). The public mission of the Plaintiff: The construction site for the construction project of the Daejeon apartment reconstruction site: The construction site for the construction project of the non-point pollution reduction facilities among the Daejeon apartment reconstruction project: the contract price after the completion of use from September 2015 to September 1, 2015: (10%) the separate payment method of the value-added tax: (40%) after completion of the authorization of KRW 38,000,000: (152,00,000 after completion of the contract: (152,000,000; and (3)00,000,000 won after completion of the implementation of the contract: 152,000,000 won after completion of the implementation of the contract; and (40% after completion of the construction project.

D. The Plaintiff prepared a written review of total water pollution load and a non-point pollution plan according to the instant project, accordingly.