약정금 등
1. As to KRW 1,209,585,956 among the Plaintiff and KRW 862,713,356 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall start on November 30, 201, and the remainder 346,872.
1. Basic facts
A. Joint acceptance of the instant raw water insurance contract 1) The Doo Marine Lighting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Doo Marine Lighting”).
) On June 22, 2007, the Netherlands, WSB.V. (hereinafter referred to as “each client of this case”) is the World Partnership V IB.V. (hereinafter referred to as “each client of this case”).
from each vessel’s number Gm-106, Gm-107, each “106 vessel” and “107 vessel” respectively.
A) The construction was requested. Each of the above orders orders decided to make advance payment of an amount equivalent to 80% of the shipbuilding price before the completion of the vessel, and then, in the event of an accident not to deliver the vessel in return for the ocean-going boat, the owner demanded a players' refund guarantee bond issued by an insurance company to the Doo Marine Shipbuilding in order to be guaranteed the refund of advance payment paid before the accident occurred. 2) The Doo Marine Shipbuilding requested the Defendant to issue an advance refund guarantee certificate to the Defendant, and the Defendant again proposed that the Plaintiff take over the advance refund guarantee bond (hereinafter “the raw water insurance of this case”) to the Plaintiff as an executive secretary, and the Plaintiff jointly, around March 3, 2008, the Defendant sent the back payment guarantee bond to the Plaintiff with respect to re-insurance as an executive secretary, and requested the Plaintiff to accept the aforementioned re-insurance by specifying the following rate of the Plaintiff’s subscription as follows:
SECURITESS: A-orbrove, detailer (reinsuranceer A- or above, confirmation of the credit rating A- or above, the details thereof after final subscription) in March 4, 2008, the Plaintiff, on March 4, 2008, indicated as follows, 40% of the Plaintiff’s acquisition ratio out of the raw water insurance of this case and 4% of the Plaintiff’s net holding ratio among them, and 36% of the amount recovered by the Defendant to be disposed of as re-insurance secured by the Defendant (the instant document No. 9).