beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.08.24 2018고합193

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복상해등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged were corrected or corrected in accordance with the facts obtained through the examination of evidence without the amendment process to the extent that the basic facts, including apparent clerical errors and errors, are identical and do not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense.

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On December 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by the Incheon District Court for interference with business affairs, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 19, 2018.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.);

A. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim B, “Around February 16, 2017, around 19:30, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main store business by avoiding disturbance from the main store operated by the victim B (V, 58 years old) located in the Gyeyang-gu Incheon apartment shopping mall.

After being prosecuted by the victim of the crime of “(112)” on the charge of committing the crime, he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year on March 31, 2017 by the Incheon District Court for obstructing business operations.

Therefore, the Defendant did not interfere with the business of the main points operated by the victimized person as above, but the victim filed a false report 112, and the Defendant was detained by stating the damage during the investigation process.

I thought that the victim was fluored with respect to the honor of the victim, and that the victim was fluored with retaliation.

The defendant found the above main points around 19:00 on March 14, 2018, and reported to the victim "I am a Chewing year".

No matter how there has been no crime, so we will die.

“Pashing a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife,” and threatened knife with knife at home.

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation, such as complaint and accusation, statement, testimony or submission of data in connection with the investigation or trial of his criminal case.

B. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim D (hereinafter “Defendant”) on April 2, 201.