2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

가. 인정사실 1) 원고는 2002. 8. 31.경 이래 동물보호단체인 C의 대표로 활동하였다. 2) 원고에 관한 기사 제목을 “ D”으로 하여 내용이 게재된 인터넷 기사에 대하여 인터넷 사이트 게시판에 “시발 저년이나 우리집개찡 ㅍㅌㅊ. 지랄떠는 새끼들이나 거기에 귀엽노 이지랄 떨면서 일베주는 새끼들이나 다 똑같아 병신새끼들아”이라는 내용의 댓글이 게시되었는데, 피고는 2013. 4. 19. 위 댓글에 대하여 “개도둑년이랑 개 키우는 집이랑 무슨 상관 ”이라는 댓글을 작성하여 게시하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the Defendant’s liability for damages and the scope of the above recognition: (a) insulting the Plaintiff by using the expression “Madoar Juvenile” that could undermine the Plaintiff’s social reputation on the Internet website bulletin board that enables an unspecified number of people to confirm the contents of the text; and (b) caused the Plaintiff’s emotional distress; and (c) accordingly, (d) the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff a monetary injury.

Furthermore, with respect to the amount of consolation money, in consideration of the various circumstances indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the following: (a) the Defendant, in relation to the above Internet articles against the Plaintiff, posted comments on the comments that are different from the Defendant’s own opinion, and the content and degree of expression, it is reasonable to determine the amount of consolation money to be paid to the Plaintiff by the Defendant as KRW 100,000.

Therefore, from April 19, 201, the date when the defendant committed a tort against the plaintiff, the defendant 10,000 won for consolation money and 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act until July 22, 2016, which is the date when the court of first instance rendered a substantial decision, to dispute on the existence and scope of the obligation.