When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 29, 2017, at around 12:00 and around 59 years of age, the Defendant continuously obstructed restaurant business for about one hour by making a bath, such as 'the drinking festing year and the drinking year without any justifiable reason', in the D restaurant operated by the victim C (at 59 years of age) in the Daejeon Dong-gu B, and 'the drinking year', and 'the drinking year without any reason.'

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of internal investigation reports and field photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It shall be considered disadvantageously that there were five times the criminal records, such as injury and damage of property, and the degree of interference with business, in favor of the fact that the court recognized and agreed on the error of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the treatment for mental illness, etc., and the fact that the degree of interference with business is not negligible.