However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 13, 2015, at the front road of Mapo-gu Seoul, the Defendant: (a) 00:18 on August 13, 2015, at the front road of Mapo-gu, the part of the Earbur 112 patrol 112 patrol vehicles (br 27 patrol vehicles) parked in a place where the Defendant was urged to return home after receiving a report as well as an article of the taxi that the former Defendant tried to get out of the taxi; and (b) the Defendant got out of it.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of patrols, patrol booms images, and black booms CDs images;

1. Relevant Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing under the following) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending sentence] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 6 months) of the invalidation and destruction of public goods (the invalidation of public goods) [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant has been subject to criminal punishment several times due to violent crimes, but there is also a need for a strict punishment of the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime. However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and against the defendant, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case such as the age, character and behavior, environment, etc. of the defendant are considered.